Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/colon/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-07.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search
Advanced Search
mobile menu button

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Ann Coloproctol > Volume 36(3); 2020 > Article
Editorial
 Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
Kyung Jong Kim, M.D.orcid
Annals of Coloproctology 2020;36(3):129-130.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.15
Published online: June 30, 2020

Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea

Correspondence to: Kyung Jong Kim, M.D. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Chosun University, 365 Pilmundaero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61453, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-3068, Fax +82-62-228-3441 E-mail: kjkim@chosun.ac.kr

Copyright © 2020 The Korean Society of Coloproctology

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

next
  • 3,089 Views
  • 98 Download
Full Article

Download PDF Download PDF

See the article "".
See Article on Page [Related article:] 148-154
It is a great pleasure to review the article titled “Early and Late Functional Outcomes of Anal Sphincter-Sparing Procedures With Total Mesorectal Excision for Anorectal Adenocarcinoma” [1]. The authors report excellent postoperative outcomes, only 10.6% of fecal incontinence and 58% of normal anal tone after intersphincteric resection (ISR) for very low rectal cancer.
In 1994, Schiessel et al. [2] first report ISR for very low rectal tumor, which dissects intersphincteric plane with removal of the internal sphincter and bowel continuity is restored by coloanal anastomosis, instead of traditional abdominoperineal resection. However, this extreme operation raises 2 major concerns, local recurrence, and anorectal dysfunction. In a review of ISR for lowlying rectal cancer, the local recurrence rate ranged from 0% to 12% [3], which results seem like acceptable. But in terms of bowel dysfunction after ISR, the functional outcomes showed very complicated with a wide range, 0% to 75.9% of major fecal incontinence [3, 4]. The common symptoms after ISR were an inability to get to the toilet in time, sense of incomplete evacuation, and fragmentation of defecation. In the review of anal dysfunction after ISR, preoperative chemoradiotherapy consistently represents an independent risk factor [3, 5, 6]. But in this article, neoadjuvant therapy did not affect postoperative continence outcome, instead male sex, tumor location less than 3 cm from anal verge, tumor T-stage, total resection of the internal anal sphincter, and occurrence of postoperative colonic stenosis were correlated with poor continence function.
The reason of wide range of bowel dysfunction after ISR seems to be multifactorial including patient factors and measurement methods. Low anterior resection syndrome score, Wexner incontinence score, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center score, and Kirwan grade are usually used for subjectively assessing functional outcomes after ISR. Of these, Kirwan grade is the most simple, others are somewhat complex for scoring. Also, anorectal manometry and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used as an objective tool for assessing anal function after ISR. But in spite of relative high cost and time-consuming procedures, these tools have a little serious disadvantage, for example, operator dependent for anorectal manometry and poor correlation to patient-reported symptom for dynamic MRI [5].
The authors assess anal tone after ISR using the per-anal examination scoring system (PASS), which is modified from DRESS (digital rectal examination scoring system) [7]. The PASS is simply divided 5 grades of postoperative anal function: grade 1 (extremely hypotonic sphincter), grade 2 (slightly hypotonic), grade 3 (normal tone), grade 4 (slightly stenotic), and grade 5 (occluded anal canal). This method seems to be very simple and easy to use. But there is a risk of inter-observer variation.
Currently, there is no standard method for assessing bowel function after ISR, although this operation inevitably causes bowel dysfunctions. It is essential to develop standard method for assessing not only objective anal function, but also patient-reported outcomes.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest to this article is reported.

  • 1. Eldamshety O, Kotb S, Khater A, Elnahas W, Roshdy S, Zahi MS et al. Early and late functional outcomes of anal sphincter-sparing procedures with total mesorectal excision for anorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Coloproctol 2020;39:148–54.ArticlePDF
  • 2. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumours. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Park IJ, Kim JC. Intersphincteric resection for patients with lowlying rectal cancer: oncological and functional outcomes. Ann Coloproctol 2018;34:167–74.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 4. Sakr A, Yang SY, Kang JH, Cho MS, Han YD, Min BS, et al. Oncologic safety and bowel function after ultralow anterior resection with or without intersphincteric resection for low lying rectal cancer: Comparative cross sectional study. J Surg Oncol 2020;121:365–74.ArticlePubMed
  • 5. Collard M, Lefevre JH. Ultimate functional preservation with intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2020;10:297. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Battersby NJ, Juul T, Christensen P, Janjua AZ, Branagan G, Emmertsen KJ, et al. Predicting the risk of bowel-related quality-oflife impairment after restorative resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter cross- sectional study. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:270–80.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Orkin BA, Sinykin SB, Lloyd PC. The digital rectal examination scoring system (DRESS). Dis Colon Rectum 2010;53:1656–60.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • Cite this Article
        Cite this Article
        export Copy Download
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.
        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
        Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):129-130.   Published online June 30, 2020
        DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.15
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Related articles
      Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
      Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
      Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
      © Korean Society of Coloproctology.
      TOP