Influence of colonic mesenteric area on the number of lymph node retrieval for colon cancer: a prospective cohort study

Article information

Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):77-84

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 September 16

doi : https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00444.0063

Nadir Adnan Hacım^,1, Ahmet Akbaş¹, Yigit Ulgen², Talar Vartanoglu Aktokmakyan¹, Serhat Meric¹, Merve Tokocin¹, Onder Karabay³, Yuksel Altinel¹

¹Department of General Surgery Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

²Department of Pathology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

³Department of Surgery, Yedikule Surp Pırgiç Armenian Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence to: Nadir Adnan Hacım, MD Department of General Surgery, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Merkez Mah. Dr. Sadık Ahmet Cd. No: 5, Istanbul 34200, Turkey Email: adnanhcm@hotmail.com

Received 2021 June 5; Revised 2021 July 30; Accepted 2021 July 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An acceptable minimum harvested lymph node (LN) count during surgical treatment of colon cancer has been advocated by many national associations [1]. Besides being an indicator of surgical treatment quality, the minimum harvested 12 LNs is required for accurate staging of colorectal cancer patients [2-4]. Removal of adequate, even higher counts of LNs is shown to be associated with better survival specifically for right-sided colon cancer [5-7].

In previous studies, the association of several variables with the total LN count has been analyzed. Patients’ general health, age, sex, operative, and tumoral features, including the length of resected bowel, mesocolic mesenteric area, tumor site, and tumor mass, would be essential parameters leading to the different outcomes of LNs yield [3, 8, 9].

Although the length of resected colon is dependent on mucosal margins, arterial anatomic variations, and extent of lymphadenectomy, resection of longer colonic segments with larger mesocolic mesentery may also lead to higher counts of LN [10]. An increase in the number of retrieved LNs with increasing length of resected colon segments has been shown [3, 8, 11-17]. The relationship between the length of the colon and the mesocolic mesenteric area associated with the LN count has not been studied in detail. The area’s measurement may be an indirect representation of both the resected colon and the vascular pedicle’s lengths. So, assessment of these associations may be essential parameters that necessitate any standardization measure. We hypothesized that there is a close association between the mesocolic mesenteric area and the number of harvested LNs leading to an adequate staging. But, the impact of harvesting more LNs on the staging of colon cancer remains controversial.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the total LN count following colectomy and analyze the impact of metric variables, including the lengths of resected bowel, vascular pedicle, and the mesocolic mesenteric area on the nodal harvest.

METHODS

Pathology

After the incision’s closure, the primary researcher (NAH) measured the distances given below and the colonic mesentery. The fresh specimen was fixed and laid out flat on an engineering graph millimeter paper in the operating room (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.

Calculation of the colonic mesenteric area in the right hemicolectomy specimen on an engineering graph millimeter paper (from A to D).

The lengths as millimeters are as follows: (a) proximal colon; (b) ileum in cases with right hemicolectomy only; (c) proximal border (a+b in cases with the right hemicolectomy, only an in patients with other types of surgery); (d) tumor; (e) distal border; (f) total specimen (c+d+e); (g) vascular pedicle, the longitudinal distance between the nearest bowel wall and the end of ligated major vascular pedicle depending on the tumor’s localization [1] (Fig. 2). The colonic mesenteric areas as mm2 are shown in Fig. 1B–D.

Fig. 2.

Schematic representation of the metric variables on the right hemicolectomy (A) and the left hemicolectomy specimens (B).

The specimens were then directly sent to the pathology laboratory and examined in a standardized manner with manual dissection for the LNs. A consultant histopathologist performed microscopic and macroscopic pathological analysis using a standard colorectal protocol. Fat-clearing methods were not used in each. In the case of the yield < 12 LNs, a second attempt to examine LNs was performed. The depth of invasion and the count of metastatic LNs supported the disease’s stage using the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control, 7th edition [16].

The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the total count of LNs as < 12 and ≥ 12 [1].

RESULTS

There were 49 patients with a median age of 64 years. There were more male patients (53.1%) in the study group. The laparoscopic approach (65.3%) was more common than the open approach (20.4%). Right hemicolectomy was performed in 22 patients (44.9%), whereas in 20 (40.8%) and 7 patients (14.3%), sigmoid resection and left hemicolectomy were applied. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients

The median diameter of the tumors was 60 mm. The sigmoid colon was the most common location seen in 20 patients (40.8%). Considering T stages, T3 and T4 comprised the majority of the cases (91.8%). Tumoral features of the study group are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Tumoral features of the study groups

In the study group, the median count for total LNs was 22, and 59.2% of the patients were LN positive. In 3 patients (6.1%), there was an inadequate LN yield (< 12). In these patients, the median total LN count was 8 (P<0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Analysis of the morphometric features of the specimens with the groups based on total LN count

The patients with < 12 and ≥ 12 LNs have had similar demographic, clinical, and tumoral features. No significant associations were found between the adequacy of LN retrieval and the variables (P>0.05) (Tables 1, 2).

Although there was a significant difference in the total LN count in patients with < 12 LNs and ≥ 12 LNs (P<0.001), we did not found a significant difference in malignant LNs between the groups (P=0.758). Similarly, the malignant-to-total ratio was similar in the groups (P=0.671).

When comparing the patients with adequate vs. inadequate retrievals, the morphometric measures, including the lengths of specimen, tumor, proximal border, distal border, and vascular pedicle, were also similar in the groups (P>0.05) (Table 3). The ileum length in patients with right hemicolectomy and proximal colon length in patients with sigmoid resection and left hemicolectomy did not significantly differ between the groups (P>0.05). There was a longer length of the vascular pedicle and larger mesenteric area in patients with ≥ 12 LNs; we did not detect a statistical significance (P=0.317 and P=0.097) (Table 3).

Correlation analysis revealed that there were significant positive correlations between total LN count and the length of vascular pedicle and mesenteric area (r=0.576, P<0.001 and r=0.566, P<0.001) (Table 4; Fig. 3A, B). However, there were no significant correlations between total LN count and other morphometric measurements. The morphometric measurements also did not correlate with the malignant LN count and (P>0.05) (Table 5).

Table 4.

Correlation analysis of the total lymph node counts with morphometric tumoral features

Fig. 3.

Correlation of the total lymph node number with the length of vascular pedicle (A) and the colonic mesenteric area (B).

Table 5.

Correlation analysis of malignant lymph node counts with morphometric tumoral features

DISCUSSION

This study showed significant correlations between total LN count and the length of vascular pedicle and mesenteric area. Although the grouping based on the minimum harvested 12 LNs for accurate staging of nodal status revealed no difference considering the length of the vascular pedicle and mesenteric area, we think that any increase in these 2 parameters may consequently lead to an increase in the probability of an accurate staging for colon cancer.

The LN yield in colon resection specimens is thought to be dependent on several variables. Although some are uncontrollable, including tumoral features, others are within the surgeons’ control [1]. The length of vascular pedicle is another parameter that has an impact on the LN yield. It is expected to reach a similar length of vascular pedicles after the successful application of standardized techniques such as complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation. However, the length of the vascular pedicles may have different measurements due to the individual variations associated with the body morphometric characteristics. Brändstedt et al. [18] showed that increasing quartiles of weight, hip, waist, BMI, and waist-hip ratio were significantly associated with an increased risk of LN positivity in men. But, they did not evaluate the possible relationship between the total LN count and the length of the vascular pedicles in patients with different body morphometric characteristics. In the current study, we could not evaluate such parameters except for BMI due to the retrospective design of the study. We also found no impact of BMI on the LN counts. It is recommended to take these parameters into consideration for future studies.

Kent et al. [8] showed that the pathological pedicle length correlated with the total nodal yield consistent with our results. In our study, longer length of the vascular pedicle and larger mesenteric area were found in patients with ≥ 12 LNs without statistical significance. However, other numerical variables did not significantly associate with total LN yield. Based on these findings, we may think that the pedicle length is crucial in LN yield.

Besides the number of vascular pedicles in colon cancer surgery, the area of mesenteric resection, the length of vascular pedicle, and resected bowel are other variables predicting the LN count following colectomy [1]. All these parameters, separately or in combination, have been evaluated considering their impacts on the LN yield. Quality of the pathological examination is another essential parameter that has an impact on the number of retrieved LNs [19-21]. In the presence of adequate proximal and distal borders, a detailed and careful pathological examination may lead to an increased yield. Although the second-look LN search caused considerable increases in the LN counts and number of cases with at least 12 LNs, its benefit on the accurate staging was limited [20]. Becerra et al. [19] reported a large variation particularly between pathologists in suboptimal LN examination following colectomy. In the light of these explanations, we think that there is a difficulty in the standardization of the pathological examination techniques. Future studies are needed to investigate the impact of several approaches including the second-look LN search, exhaustive submission of mesenteric fat, or fat-clearing methods [20].

Although there were controversial results concerning the association of the length of resected bowel and the LN yield [1, 3, 10, 11, 14, 15], some authors also tried to find the cutoff values of specimen lengths for adequate LN counts. They showed that there should be almost < 20 cm of specimen length for sufficient LN counts [22, 23]. They evaluated both colon and rectal cancers in their study that can be regarded as a confounding factor. Others concluded that an increased resected mesenteric area is not associated with an increase in nodal yield, considering the lack of association with the total length of bowel resected and the total nodal yield [8]. In this study, we found a significant correlation between the mesenteric area and the total LN yield. If we regarded the mesenteric area as the reflection of both the length of vascular pedicle and resected intestinal segments, there should be little surprise that a higher yield of LNs would be achieved with resection of more mesenteric area. So, instead of the measurements of both the lengths of the vascular pedicle and the resected intestinal segments, the colonic mesenteric area may be used as a surrogate measure of surgical quality and nodal yield.

It is also logical to find that the number of the resected vascular pedicles may positively affect the total yield of LNs. However, Nash et al. [1] found that the mean number of nodes decreased as the degree of the pedicles increased from the primary to the tertiary. They detected the highest counts of LNs (14.6 LNs) for the primary pedicle and the lowest counts (3.6 LNs) for the tertiary pedicle. They thought that dissection of the vascular pedicle closest to the tumor caused this outcome. Lack of the measurements of the lengths may be regarded as a significant limitation for these results. In the present study, we did not differentiate the LNs found in the secondary or tertiary pedicles. However, the detection of the majority of LNs in the primary vascular pedicle as in Nash et al.’s study [1] supported our approach. Analysis of at least one major vascular pedicle can be regarded as sufficient for the nodal harvest.

Several patient-related and tumor-related factors have been identified as the significant independent risk factors for LN yield [4, 12, 15]. The right-sided tumors and larger tumor size were significantly associated with a higher total LN count [1, 12, 14]. There may be anatomic or biological differences between right-sided or left-sided colonic cancers. The authors speculated that increased cancer antigen presentation or inflammatory responses secondary to ulceration in larger tumors might result in such findings [15]. A longer mesenteric radix has also been questioned for right-sided tumors [14]. We believe that it is tough to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms for these associations. We also did not find any significant associations between tumoral features, including tumor size and location, and the LN groupings based on 12 LNs. Further prospective studies in which several predictors and confounder factors are considered are needed to address these questions.

In current studies, the rate of resections with adequate harvested LNs ranges up to 96.6% [1]. Our rate was 93.9%. We may think that the infrequency of finding fewer than 12 LNs is so small to identify the predictive factors on the quality of LN dissection using a meaningful statistical analysis [1].

As an interesting finding, we did not find a significant correlation between the total and malignant LN in resected specimens. The absence of this correlation was also reported by other researchers [1, 3, 14]. Besides, there is a lack of data regarding improved survival secondary to the higher yield of total LNs in association with the mere elongation of the bowel resected [3]. Some studies also failed to show any improvement in the staging in association with an increased LN count [5, 20]. So, evidences that an adequate number of nodes will alter the staging and improve outcomes should be provided by future studies.

The relatively low sample size of the study that can be regarded as insufficient to determine minor differences is the major limitation. Besides, the results of a single-center study may prevent the generalizability of the conclusions. The retrospective design and absence of survival outcomes were the other limitations. The measurement of the mesenteric area and the length of vascular pedicle were the study’s main strengths.

In conclusion, the length of the vascular pedicle and mesenteric area was significantly correlated with total LN counts and, consequently, LN retrieval’s adequacy following colon cancer surgery. The colonic mesenteric area can be used alone as a measure for the assessment of the nodal yield. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical use of such measurements in association with staging and survival.

Article information Continued