Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Chang Kyu Oh; Jung Wook Huh; You Jin Lee; Moon Suk Choi; Dae Hee Pyo; Sung Chul Lee; Seong Mun Park; Jung Kyong Shin; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee

doi:10.3393/ac.2019.10.15

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Ann Coloproctol > Volume 36(4); 2020 > Article

Original Article Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Wook Huh, You Jin Lee, Moon Suk Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Sung Chul Lee, Seong Mun Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Annals of Coloproctology 2020;36(4):273-280.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15
Published online: November 13, 2019

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Jung Wook Huh, M.D. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea Tel: +82-2-3410-1826, Fax: +82-2-3410-6980 E-mail: jungwook.huh@gmail.com

• Received: August 30, 2019 • Revised: October 14, 2019 • Accepted: October 15, 2019

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

6,436 Views
171 Download
23 Web of Science
23 Crossref
22 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ARTICLE INFORMATION
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods
From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results
Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion
Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.
Keywords: Postoperative complications; Colorectal cancer surgery; Risk factor; Recurrence

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly occurring cancer in males and the second most commonly occurring cancer in females. Over 1.8 million new cases and 881,000 deaths occurred in 2018 [1]. Surgical resection is the main treatment of choice for patients with stages I–III colorectal cancer [2]. Despite advancements in surgical methods, postoperative complications are observed in up to 35% of patients who undergo radical colorectal cancer surgery [3-8]. The impact of postoperative complications that affect long-term oncologic outcomes after radical colorectal surgery is controversial [8-12].

Some authors have shown that injuries associated with surgery stimulate tumor growth and dissemination [13-15]. Other researchers have shown that postoperative complications affect the immunological response, which improves undetected tumor viability and increases disease recurrence [16, 17]. In most studies, researchers analyzed all complications after curative colorectal cancer surgery, whether related to the surgery or not [9, 12, 18, 19]. The elimination of complications not related to surgery, i.e., those beyond the surgeon’s control, would provide meaningful analysis in identification of surgical factors.

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between minor and major surgery-related complication subgroups according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification system. The influence of surgery-related postoperative complications on diseasefree survival between these 2 subgroups was compared.

METHODS

Patients

We retrospectively analyzed 1,149 patients who underwent radical surgery for stages I–III colorectal cancer at Samsung Medical Center from January 2010 to December 2010. The exclusion criteria were (1) recurrent colorectal cancer, (2) metachronous cancer, (3) hereditary colorectal cancer, and (4) radical surgery not performed (patient underwent local excision and polypectomy). Among 1,149 patients, 334 experienced postoperative complications within 30 days after colorectal radical surgery. Among these 334 patients, 24 experienced complications not related to surgery. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Samsung Medical Center (IRB No. 2019-08-056- 001), and informed consent was waived.

All patients underwent curative surgery performed by 6 welltrained colorectal surgeons. Cancer staging followed the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM classification guidelines [20]. According to radiologic evaluation, patients with locally advanced (radiological T3/T4 or N positive) rectal cancer located within 10 cm of the anal verge received preoperative therapy with a 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen or underwent radiotherapy of the whole pelvis at a dose of 40.4−50.4 Gy.

Five-fluorouracil-based chemo-regimen was preferentially considered as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with T3, T4, or node-positive disease after surgical resection. This decision was based on patient health status, compliance, and physician preference. Patients were followed up at 3-month intervals for the first 2 years, at 6-month intervals for the next 3 years, and yearly thereafter. Follow-up surveillance examinations included clinical history, physical examination, measurement of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, chest X-ray, and chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography scan. Additional pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scans were performed every 6 to 12 months depending on patient status. Colonoscopy was performed 1 year after surgery and then every 2 years [20].

The 310 patients were retrospectively placed into 5 categories according to the extended CD classification system for surgical complications published by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group in 2016 [21]. The CD classification system published in 2004 provided for simple categorization of postoperative complications [22]. CD classification, along with the extended CD classification system, was established to standardize adverse event terms and provide more detailed grading guidelines in clinical practice [21].

Postoperative morbidity was defined as a complication occurring during the hospital stay or within 30 days after surgery. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to CD classification: minor complication group including CD grades I to II and major complication group including CD grades III to IV.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Clinicopathologic features of the 2 groups were analyzed using chi-square test or t-test. Continuous variables were recorded as the median and minimum to maximum ranges. Variables with P-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant in univariate analysis. Using the variables identified as statistically significant by univariate analysis, multivariate analysis was carried out using the logistic regression model and Cox regression method. Disease-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between curves were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 1,149 patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer underwent curative radical surgery in 2010. Of these patients, 334 patients (29.1%) had postoperative complications; 24 patients (2.1%) who experienced complications unrelated to surgery were excluded. The remaining 310 patients (27.0%) were categorized into 1 of 5 grades according to CD classification: (1) 52 patients (4.5%) were CD grade I; (2) 142 patients (12.4%) were CD grade II; (3) 78 patients (6.8%) were CD grade IIIa; 35 patients (3.0%) were CD grade IIIb; and (4) 3 patients (0.3%) were CD grade IVa. Severe complications such as CD grade IVb and mortality were absent. The type and frequency of complications are shown in Table 1. The most common type of complication related to surgery was wound complication (31.6%); postoperative ileus (19.7%) was the second most common complication. Anastomosis leakage occurred in 11.9% of cases and was the second most common complication (20.7%) in the major complication group. Most complications unrelated to surgery were in the minor complication group (91.7%).

Patients were divided into 2 subgroups, a minor complication group (CD grade I/II) and a major complication group (CD grade III/IV) containing 194 and 116 patients, respectively. Comparisons of clinicopathologic features of patients according to complication groups (CD grade I/II vs. III/IV) are shown in Table 2. Preoperative obstruction, operative method, length of hospital stay, pathologic N category, and tumor size differed significantly between the 2 groups.

Risk factors influencing the major complication group are shown in Table 3. Univariate logistic regression indicated that preoperative obstruction, operative method, pathologic N category, and neoadjuvant therapy were risk factors. On multivariate analysis, operative method, and pathologic N category were independent risk factors for the major complication group.

In the median follow-up of 72.2 months (range, 0.2 to 113.6 months), the 5-year disease-free survival rate of this cohort was 81.5%. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of the minor complication group (CD grades I and II) and the major complication group (CD grades III and IV) were 84.4% and 78.5%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between minor and major complication groups (P= 0.392) (Fig. 1). The survival curves according to pathologic TNM stage differed significantly. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with pStage 0, pStage I, pStage II, and pStage III were 95.5%, 94.1%, 84.2%, and 69.8%, respectively (P< 0.001) (Fig. 2).

Univariate analysis indicated that the prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, emergency surgery, transfusion during operation, pathologic T category, pathologic N category, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), tumor budding, receiving neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy. On multivariate analysis, preoperative perforation, PNI, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

In this study, 334 patients (29.1%) with postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery were investigated. Among these, 310 patients (27.0%) experienced surgery-related complications. The surgery-related complication cohort was classified into 2 subgroups, minor and major complication groups, encompassing 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. These complication rates are consistent with those of previous studies [3-8, 19, 23, 24]. Risk factors for major surgeryrelated complications were analyzed. There were differences in the operative method and pathologic N category between minor and major complication groups. Pathologic N category was associated with severity of cancer stage; pathologic N category positive refers to stage III colorectal cancer or higher according to the 7th AJCC TNM classification. Previous studies have shown a relationship between higher cancer stage and an increased incidence of postoperative complications [8, 25, 26].

Open surgery is considered a risk factor for increased surgeryrelated major complications. Laparoscopic surgery has advantages over open surgery with no difference in oncologic outcome; advantages include less blood loss, shorter length of wound, faster recovery of bowel function, and shorter hospital stay [3-5]. The laparoscopic approach reduces wound incision and decreases the possibility of wound complications such as seroma, infection, and the need for resuturing under local anesthesia. These complications are categorized as major complications by the extended CD classification system [21].

The impact of postoperative complications that affect oncologic long-term outcomes in colorectal cancer remains controversial. Recent studies have shown that postoperative complications have a negative effect on the oncologic outcome. In particular, infectious complications, surgical intensive care unit admission, and location of anastomosis leakage were associated with negative prognosis [7, 11, 12, 23, 27-29]. Several studies demonstrated that postoperative complications impact short-term and long-term survival as described above. However, some researchers contend that postoperative complications do not have a significant effect on the oncologic outcome or disease-free survival in colorectal cancer [8, 9, 30]. In our study, advanced cancer stage and operative method were surgery-related risk factors for major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, the results show no differences in 5-year disease-free survival between minor (84.4%) and major (78.5%) complication groups. These surgeryrelated major complications did not influence disease-free survival (P= 0.392) of colorectal cancer patients.

As described in our study, preoperative perforation, PNI, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy were prognostic factors of disease-free survival in colorectal cancer surgery. These results are consistent with our institute’s previous study showing that LVI, PNI, and tumor budding are as strong predictors of colorectal cancer disease-free survival [20]. Preoperative perforation and receiving neoadjuvant therapy could be related to the severity of cancer stage affecting recurrence.

An objective stratification protocol was used to classify patient complications based on treatment modality rather than clinical manifestations. The extended CD classification system that standardizes adverse event terms in more detail was used [21]. This helped us overcome the limitation of retrospective data collection. However, the CD classification system stratifies surgical complications based on the invasiveness of the treatment modality. This grading system may not reflect the impact of a patient’s systemic condition after surgery [8].

As a retrospective single center study, our study has a few limitations. Type II error may be present due to the relatively small number of patients. In our study, 57 patients underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, so combining of ypStage with pStage can cause bias. Another limitation is that our study did not consider patient comorbidities. Even if a patient had many comorbidities, the most invasive treatment grade was based on extended CD classification. This bias might underestimate the comorbidity effect on patients.

In conclusion, advanced cancer stage and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increasing surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, the severity of postoperative complications did not affect the disease-free survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.

Disease-free survival (DFS) curves by postoperative complication group of Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification after colorectal cancer surgery.

Fig. 2.

Disease-free survival (DFS) curves according to pathologic TNM stage (pStage) after colorectal cancer surgery.

Table 1.

Type and frequency of complication

Type	Total	Clavien-Dindo classification
Type	Total	I	II	IIIa	IIIb	IV
Surgery-related		Minor complication 194 (62.6)		Major complication 116 (37.4)
Wound complication	98 (31.6)	20 (6.5)	12 (3.9)	63 (20.3)	3 (1.0)	-
Ileus	61 (19.7)	11 (3.5)	40 (12.9)	7 (2.3)	2 (0.6)	1 (0.3)
Urinary retention	58 (18.7)	13 (4.2)	45 (14.5)	-	-	-
Anastomosis leakage	37 (11.9)	-	13 (4.2)	1 (0.3)	22 (7.1)	1 (0.3)
Postoperative bleeding	27 (8.7)	7 (2.3)	16 (5.2)	-	3 (1.0)	1 (0.3)
Chylous ascites	13 (4.2)	1 (0.3)	12 (3.9)	-	-	-
Intraabdominal fluid collection	12 (3.9)	-	4 (1.3)	7 (2.3)	1 (0.3)	-
Rectovaginal fistula	2 (0.6)	-	-	-	2 (0.6)	-
Bowel perforation	2 (0.6)	-	-	-	2 (0.6)	-
Total	310 (100)	52 (16.8)	142 (45.8)	78 (25.2)	35 (11.3)	3 (1.0)
Surgery-unrelated
Pulmonary complication	13 (54.2)	6 (25.0)	6 (25.0)	-	-	1 (4.2)
Urinary dysfunction	4 (16.7)	-	3 (12.5)	-	1 (4.2)	-
Neurologic complication	3 (12.5)	1 (4.2)	2 (8.3)	-	-	-
Cardiac complication	2 (8.3)	-	2 (8.3)	-	-	-
Other	2 (8.3)	-	2 (8.3)	-	-	-

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.

Clinicopathologic features of surgery-related complications cohort (n=310)

Variable	CD grades I, II (n=194)	CD grades III, IV (n=116)	P-value
Preoperative features
Age (yr)	60.5 (33–83)	59 (32–85)	0.545
Sex
Female	67 (65.5)	38 (32.8)	0.749
Male	127 (65.5)	78 (67.2)
ASA PS classification
I, II	176 (95.7)	102 (94.4)^a	0.641
III, IV	8 (4.3)	6 (5.6)
Body mass index (kg/m²)	23.78 (15.12–35.34)	23.46 (16.45–30.52)	0.415
Preoperative CEA level (ng/mL)	1.83 (0.5–126.37)	2.23 (0.5–125.70)^b	0.465
Underlying disease
Hypertension	63 (32.5)	42 (36.2)	0.502
Diabetes mellitus	38 (19.6)	21 (18.1)	0.747
Heart disease	14 (7.2)	7 (6.0)	0.689
Cerebrovascular disease	8 (4.1)	1 (0.9)	0.980
Pulmonary disease	12 (6.2)	8 (6.9)	0.805
Previous abdominal surgery	57 (29.4)	35 (30.2)	0.883
Preoperative treatment
Chemotherapy	1 (0.5)	1 (0.7)	0.130
Radiotherapy	0 (0)	0 (0)
Chemoradiotherapy	28 (14.4)	27 (23.3)
Preoperative stenting	2 (1.0)	3 (2.6)	0.293
Obstruction	19 (9.8)	23 (19.8)	0.012
Perforation	6 (3.1)	9 (7.8)	0.064
Intraoperative features
Type of operation
Right hemicolectomy	57 (29.4)	25 (21.6)	0.211
Left hemicolectomy	6 (3.1)	7 (6.0)
Anterior resection	32 (16.5)	17 (14.7)
Low anterior resection	92 (47.4)	56 (48.3)
Other	7 (3.6)	11 (9.5)
Level of anastomosis
Colon	111 (57.2)	60 (51.7)	0.347
Rectum	83 (42.8)	56 (48.3)
Operative method
Open surgery	94 (48.5)	82 (70.7)	< 0.001
Minimally invasive surgery	100 (51.5)	34 (29.3)
Emergency surgery	7 (3.6)	6 (5.2)	0.506
Diverting stoma	37 (19.1)	20 (17.2)	0.687
Operative time (min)	160 (43–492)	157 (64–490)	0.827
Transfusion during operation	6 (3.1)	7 (6.0)	0.211
Postoperative features
Length of hospital stay	12 (7-44)	17 (8–85)	< 0.001
Pathologic T category
0, 1, 2	83 (42.8)	37 (31.9)	0.057
3, 4	111 (57.2)	79 (68.1)
Pathologic N category
Negative	122 (62.9)	57 (49.1)	0.018
Positive	72 (37.1)	59 (50.9)
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative	127 (65.5)	70 (60.3)	0.365
Positive	67 (34.5)	46 (39.7)
Perineural invasion
Negative	173 (89.2)	102 (87.9)	0.738
Positive	21 (10.8)	14 (12.1)
Tumor budding
Negative	124 (63.9)	71 (61.2)	0.633
Positive	70 (36.1)	45 (38.8)
Tumor size (cm)	3.5 (0.1–12)	4.0 (0.2–20)	0.021
Harvested lymph nodes	16 (0–58)	17 (2–62)	0.173
Adjuvant therapy
Chemotherapy	90 (46.4)	65 (56.0)	0.102
Radiotherapy	0 (0)	1 (0.9)
Chemoradiotherapy	16 (8.2)	12 (10.3)

Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).

ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CD, Clavien-Dindo classification.

^aNot available (N/A) 18 cases.

^bN/A 12 cases.

Table 3.

Risk factors influencing Clavien-Dindo grades III and IV in surgery-related complication cohort

Variable	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
Variable	OR	95% CI	P-value	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age (> 59/ ≤ 59 yr)	0.908	0.573–1.439	0.682
Sex (male/female)	1.083	0.665–1.764	0.749
ASA PS classification (III, IV/I, II)	1.294	0.437–3.835	0.642
BMI (> 23.6/ ≤ 23.6 kg/m²)	0.871	0.550–1.381	0.558
Preoperative CEA (> 5.0/ ≤ 5.0 ng/mL)	1.310	0.708–2.426	0.390
Underlying disease
Hypertension	1.180	0.728–1.914	0.502
Diabetes mellitus	0.907	0.503–1.638	0.747
Heart disease	0.826	0.323–2.109	0.689
Cerebrovascular disease	0.202	0.025–1.638	0.134
Pulmonary disease	1.123	0.445–2.835	0.805
Preoperative stenting	2.549	0.420–15.484	0.309
Obstruction	2.278	1.180–4.397	0.014	1.750	0.886–3.457	0.107
Perforation	2.636	0.913–7.606	0.073
Operative method (open/MIS)	2.566	1.573–4.184	< 0.001	2.486	1.519–4.069	< 0.001
Emergency surgery	1.457	0.478–4.446	0.508
Operative time (> 160/ ≤ 160 min)	0.973	0.614–1.541	0.906
Transfusion during operation	2.012	0.659–6.140	0.219
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	1.597	0.985–2.588	0.058
Pathologic N category (+/−)	1.754	1.100–2.796	0.018	1.661	1.031–2.676	0.037
Lymphovascular invasion (+/−)	1.246	0.774–2.004	0.365
Perineural invasion (+/−)	1.131	0.551–2.321	0.738
Tumor budding (+/−)	1.123	0.698–1.805	0.633
Tumor size (> 3.6/ ≤ 3.6 cm)	1.180	0.744–1.870	0.481
Neoadjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.737	1.397–5.364	0.003	1.519	0.808–2.858	0.195

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; MIS, minimally invasive surgery.

Table 4.

Prognostic factors influencing disease-free survival in surgery-related complication cohort

Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	OR	95% CI	P-value	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age (> 59/ ≤ 59 yr)	0.635	0.362–1.114	0.114
Sex (male/female)	0.583	0.336–1.010	0.054
ASA PS classification (III, IV/I, II)	1.385	0.430–4.460	0.585
BMI (> 23.6/ ≤ 23.6 kg/m²)	0.882	0.509–1.527	0.653
Preoperative CEA (> 0.5/ ≤ 5.0 ng/mL)	1.842	0.975–3.483	0.060
Underlying disease
Hypertension	0.757	0.409–1.401	0.376
Diabetes mellitus	0.464	0.184–1.168	0.103
Heart disease	0.531	0.129–2.185	0.381
Cerebrovascular disease	2.407	0.749–7.731	0.140
Pulmonary disease	0.931	0.290–2.988	0.904
Preoperative stenting	3.012	0.731–12.416	0.127
Obstruction	1.013	0.456–2.250	0.974
Perforation	4.608	2.159–9.837	< 0.001	4.436	2.024–9.722	< 0.001
Operative method (open/MIS)	1.563	0.873–2.797	0.133
Emergency surgery	3.218	1.372–7.549	0.007	0.927	0.350–2.456	0.879
Operative time (> 160/ ≤ 160 min)	1.693	0.965–2.971	0.067
Transfusion during operation	2.970	1.178–7.486	0.021	1.635	0.501–5.338	0.416
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	3.288	1.600–6.7155	0.001	1.133	0.446–2.880	0.793
Pathologic N category (+/−)	3.361	1.860–6.074	< 0.001	1.787	0.824–3.876	0.142
Lymphovascular invasion (+/−)	3.365	1.907–5.939	< 0.001	1.072	0.518–2.217	0.852
Perineural invasion (+/−)	5.665	3.183–10.082	< 0.001	3.249	1.779–5.934	< 0.001
Tumor budding (+/−)	4.076	2.276–7.300	< 0.001	4.606	2.422–8.758	< 0.001
Tumor size (> 3.6/ ≤ 3.6)	1.156	0.667–2.004	0.605
Neoadjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.286	1.227–4.092	0.005	4.177	2.231–7.819	< 0.001
Adjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.348	1.205–4.576	0.012	0.782	0.333–1.834	0.572
CD (III, IV/I, II)	1.273	0.731–2.215	0.394

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; MIS, minimally invasive surgery; CD, Clavien-Dindo classification.

REFERENCES

1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394–424.Article PubMed
2. Liang J, Fazio V, Lavery I, Remzi F, Hull T, Strong S, et al. Primacy of surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2015;102:847–52.Article PubMed
3. Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H, Mizusawa J, Etoh T, Konishi F, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 2014;260:23–30.Article PubMed
4. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group, Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, Fleshman J, Anvari M, et al. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2050–9.Article PubMed
5. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:477–84.Article PubMed
6. Richards CH, Platt JJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The impact of perioperative risk, tumor pathology and surgical complications on disease recurrence following potentially curative resection of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2011;254:83–9.Article PubMed
7. Aoyama T, Oba K, Honda M, Sadahiro S, Hamada C, Mayanagi S, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on the colorectal cancer survival and recurrence: analyses of pooled individual patients’ data from three large phase III randomized trials. Cancer Med 2017;6:1573–80.Article PubMed PMC
8. Mrak K, Eberl T, Laske A, Jagoditsch M, Fritz J, Tschmelitsch J. Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2013;56:20–8.Article PubMed
9. Odermatt M, Miskovic D, Flashman K, Khan J, Senapati A, O’Leary D, et al. Major postoperative complications following elective resection for colorectal cancer decrease long-term survival but not the time to recurrence. Colorectal Dis 2015;17:141–9.Article PubMed
10. Fagard K, Leonard S, Deschodt M, Devriendt E, Wolthuis A, Prenen H, et al. The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2016;7:479–91.Article PubMed
11. McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. The impact of the type and severity of postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;97:168–77.Article PubMed
12. Breugom AJ, van Dongen DT, Bastiaannet E, Dekker FW, van der Geest LG, Liefers GJ, et al. Association between the most frequent complications after surgery for stage I-III colon cancer and shortterm survival, long-term survival, and recurrences. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:2858–65.Article PubMed PDF
13. Abramovitch R, Marikovsky M, Meir G, Neeman M. Stimulation of tumour growth by wound-derived growth factors. Br J Cancer 1999;79:1392–8.Article PubMed PMC PDF
14. Mynster T, Christensen IJ, Moesgaard F, Nielsen HJ. Effects of the combination of blood transfusion and postoperative infectious complications on prognosis after surgery for colorectal cancer. Danish RANX05 Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Br J Surg 2000;87:1553–62.Article PubMed
15. O’Dwyer PJ, Martin EW Jr. Viable intraluminal tumour cells and local/regional tumour growth in experimental colon cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1989;71:54–6.PubMed PMC
16. Goldfarb Y, Sorski L, Benish M, Levi B, Melamed R, Ben-Eliyahu S. Improving postoperative immune status and resistance to cancer metastasis: a combined perioperative approach of immunostimulation and prevention of excessive surgical stress responses. Ann Surg 2011;253:798–810.Article PubMed
17. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity 2004;21:137–48.Article PubMed
18. Watt DG, McSorley ST, Park JH, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. A postoperative systemic inflammation score predicts short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2017;24:1100–9.Article PubMed PDF
19. Slankamenac K, Slankamenac M, Schlegel A, Nocito A, Rickenbacher A, Clavien PA, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on readmission and long-term survival in patients following surgery for colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32:805–11.Article PubMed PDF
20. Huh JW, Lee WY, Shin JK, Park YA, Cho YB, Kim HC, et al. A novel histologic grading system based on lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor budding in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019;145:471–7.Article PubMed PMC PDF
21. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today 2016;46:668–85.Article PubMed PDF
22. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.Article PubMed PMC
23. Sanchez-Velazquez P, Pera M, Jimenez-Toscano M, Mayol X, Roges X, Lorente L, et al. Postoperative intra-abdominal infection is an independent prognostic factor of disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2018;20:1321–8.Article PubMed PDF
24. Ma Y, Yang Z, Qin H, Wang Y. A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 2011;28:925–33.Article PubMed PDF
25. Huh JW, Kim HC, Kim SH, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, et al. Tumor regression grade as a clinically useful outcome predictor in patients with rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Surgery 2019;165:579–85.Article PubMed
26. Shimada H, Fukagawa T, Haga Y, Oba K. Does postoperative morbidity worsen the oncological outcome after radical surgery for gastrointestinal cancers? A systematic review of the literature. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017;1:11–23.Article PubMed PMC
27. Timmers TK, Verhofstad MH, Moons KG, Leenen LP. Long-term survival after surgical intensive care unit admission: fifty percent die within 10 years. Ann Surg 2011;253:151–7.Article PubMed
28. Park JS, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, et al. Risk factors of anastomotic leakage and long-term survival after colorectal surgery. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e2890.Article PubMed PMC
29. Cienfuegos JA, Baixauli J, Beorlegui C, Ortega PM, Granero L, Zozaya G, et al. The impact of major postoperative complications on long-term outcomes following curative resection of colon cancer. Int J Surg 2018;52:303–8.Article PubMed
30. de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Andreani P, Pascal G, Saliba F, Ichai P, et al. Impact of expanding criteria for resectability of colorectal metastases on short- and long-term outcomes after hepatic resection. Ann Surg 2011;253:1069–79.Article PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study
Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694. CrossRef
Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache
Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16. CrossRef
Surgical management of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in perianal fistula: A case series
Saeed Derakhshani, Milad Karimian Ghadim, Abolfazl Salari, Mohammadreza Ghahari
Surgery Open Science.2025; 26: 1. CrossRef
Organ/space surgical site infection and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: retrospective population-based cohort study
Carlota Matallana, Paula Manchon-Walsh, Eloy Espín, Marta Pascual, Sebastiano Biondo, Marta Jiménez-Toscano, Josep Maria Borràs, Josep M Badia, Enric Limón, Luisa Aliste, Rebeca Font, Miguel Pera
BJS Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review
Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery
Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118. CrossRef
Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu
Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?
Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala
Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632. CrossRef
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282. CrossRef
Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes
Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan
Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36. CrossRef
Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study
Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery
Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher
Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87. CrossRef
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome
Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China
Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef
Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290. CrossRef

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):273-280. Published online November 13, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15

XML Download

Figure

Related articles

Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Fig. 1. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves by postoperative complication group of Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification after colorectal cancer surgery.

Fig. 2. Disease-free survival (DFS) curves according to pathologic TNM stage (pStage) after colorectal cancer surgery.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Type	Total	Clavien-Dindo classification
Type	Total	I	II	IIIa	IIIb	IV
Surgery-related		Minor complication 194 (62.6)		Major complication 116 (37.4)
Wound complication	98 (31.6)	20 (6.5)	12 (3.9)	63 (20.3)	3 (1.0)	-
Ileus	61 (19.7)	11 (3.5)	40 (12.9)	7 (2.3)	2 (0.6)	1 (0.3)
Urinary retention	58 (18.7)	13 (4.2)	45 (14.5)	-	-	-
Anastomosis leakage	37 (11.9)	-	13 (4.2)	1 (0.3)	22 (7.1)	1 (0.3)
Postoperative bleeding	27 (8.7)	7 (2.3)	16 (5.2)	-	3 (1.0)	1 (0.3)
Chylous ascites	13 (4.2)	1 (0.3)	12 (3.9)	-	-	-
Intraabdominal fluid collection	12 (3.9)	-	4 (1.3)	7 (2.3)	1 (0.3)	-
Rectovaginal fistula	2 (0.6)	-	-	-	2 (0.6)	-
Bowel perforation	2 (0.6)	-	-	-	2 (0.6)	-
Total	310 (100)	52 (16.8)	142 (45.8)	78 (25.2)	35 (11.3)	3 (1.0)
Surgery-unrelated
Pulmonary complication	13 (54.2)	6 (25.0)	6 (25.0)	-	-	1 (4.2)
Urinary dysfunction	4 (16.7)	-	3 (12.5)	-	1 (4.2)	-
Neurologic complication	3 (12.5)	1 (4.2)	2 (8.3)	-	-	-
Cardiac complication	2 (8.3)	-	2 (8.3)	-	-	-
Other	2 (8.3)	-	2 (8.3)	-	-	-

Variable	CD grades I, II (n=194)	CD grades III, IV (n=116)	P-value
Preoperative features
Age (yr)	60.5 (33–83)	59 (32–85)	0.545
Sex
Female	67 (65.5)	38 (32.8)	0.749
Male	127 (65.5)	78 (67.2)
ASA PS classification
I, II	176 (95.7)	102 (94.4)^a	0.641
III, IV	8 (4.3)	6 (5.6)
Body mass index (kg/m²)	23.78 (15.12–35.34)	23.46 (16.45–30.52)	0.415
Preoperative CEA level (ng/mL)	1.83 (0.5–126.37)	2.23 (0.5–125.70)^b	0.465
Underlying disease
Hypertension	63 (32.5)	42 (36.2)	0.502
Diabetes mellitus	38 (19.6)	21 (18.1)	0.747
Heart disease	14 (7.2)	7 (6.0)	0.689
Cerebrovascular disease	8 (4.1)	1 (0.9)	0.980
Pulmonary disease	12 (6.2)	8 (6.9)	0.805
Previous abdominal surgery	57 (29.4)	35 (30.2)	0.883
Preoperative treatment
Chemotherapy	1 (0.5)	1 (0.7)	0.130
Radiotherapy	0 (0)	0 (0)
Chemoradiotherapy	28 (14.4)	27 (23.3)
Preoperative stenting	2 (1.0)	3 (2.6)	0.293
Obstruction	19 (9.8)	23 (19.8)	0.012
Perforation	6 (3.1)	9 (7.8)	0.064
Intraoperative features
Type of operation
Right hemicolectomy	57 (29.4)	25 (21.6)	0.211
Left hemicolectomy	6 (3.1)	7 (6.0)
Anterior resection	32 (16.5)	17 (14.7)
Low anterior resection	92 (47.4)	56 (48.3)
Other	7 (3.6)	11 (9.5)
Level of anastomosis
Colon	111 (57.2)	60 (51.7)	0.347
Rectum	83 (42.8)	56 (48.3)
Operative method
Open surgery	94 (48.5)	82 (70.7)	< 0.001
Minimally invasive surgery	100 (51.5)	34 (29.3)
Emergency surgery	7 (3.6)	6 (5.2)	0.506
Diverting stoma	37 (19.1)	20 (17.2)	0.687
Operative time (min)	160 (43–492)	157 (64–490)	0.827
Transfusion during operation	6 (3.1)	7 (6.0)	0.211
Postoperative features
Length of hospital stay	12 (7-44)	17 (8–85)	< 0.001
Pathologic T category
0, 1, 2	83 (42.8)	37 (31.9)	0.057
3, 4	111 (57.2)	79 (68.1)
Pathologic N category
Negative	122 (62.9)	57 (49.1)	0.018
Positive	72 (37.1)	59 (50.9)
Lymphovascular invasion
Negative	127 (65.5)	70 (60.3)	0.365
Positive	67 (34.5)	46 (39.7)
Perineural invasion
Negative	173 (89.2)	102 (87.9)	0.738
Positive	21 (10.8)	14 (12.1)
Tumor budding
Negative	124 (63.9)	71 (61.2)	0.633
Positive	70 (36.1)	45 (38.8)
Tumor size (cm)	3.5 (0.1–12)	4.0 (0.2–20)	0.021
Harvested lymph nodes	16 (0–58)	17 (2–62)	0.173
Adjuvant therapy
Chemotherapy	90 (46.4)	65 (56.0)	0.102
Radiotherapy	0 (0)	1 (0.9)
Chemoradiotherapy	16 (8.2)	12 (10.3)

Variable	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
Variable	OR	95% CI	P-value	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age (> 59/ ≤ 59 yr)	0.908	0.573–1.439	0.682
Sex (male/female)	1.083	0.665–1.764	0.749
ASA PS classification (III, IV/I, II)	1.294	0.437–3.835	0.642
BMI (> 23.6/ ≤ 23.6 kg/m²)	0.871	0.550–1.381	0.558
Preoperative CEA (> 5.0/ ≤ 5.0 ng/mL)	1.310	0.708–2.426	0.390
Underlying disease
Hypertension	1.180	0.728–1.914	0.502
Diabetes mellitus	0.907	0.503–1.638	0.747
Heart disease	0.826	0.323–2.109	0.689
Cerebrovascular disease	0.202	0.025–1.638	0.134
Pulmonary disease	1.123	0.445–2.835	0.805
Preoperative stenting	2.549	0.420–15.484	0.309
Obstruction	2.278	1.180–4.397	0.014	1.750	0.886–3.457	0.107
Perforation	2.636	0.913–7.606	0.073
Operative method (open/MIS)	2.566	1.573–4.184	< 0.001	2.486	1.519–4.069	< 0.001
Emergency surgery	1.457	0.478–4.446	0.508
Operative time (> 160/ ≤ 160 min)	0.973	0.614–1.541	0.906
Transfusion during operation	2.012	0.659–6.140	0.219
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	1.597	0.985–2.588	0.058
Pathologic N category (+/−)	1.754	1.100–2.796	0.018	1.661	1.031–2.676	0.037
Lymphovascular invasion (+/−)	1.246	0.774–2.004	0.365
Perineural invasion (+/−)	1.131	0.551–2.321	0.738
Tumor budding (+/−)	1.123	0.698–1.805	0.633
Tumor size (> 3.6/ ≤ 3.6 cm)	1.180	0.744–1.870	0.481
Neoadjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.737	1.397–5.364	0.003	1.519	0.808–2.858	0.195

Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	OR	95% CI	P-value	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age (> 59/ ≤ 59 yr)	0.635	0.362–1.114	0.114
Sex (male/female)	0.583	0.336–1.010	0.054
ASA PS classification (III, IV/I, II)	1.385	0.430–4.460	0.585
BMI (> 23.6/ ≤ 23.6 kg/m²)	0.882	0.509–1.527	0.653
Preoperative CEA (> 0.5/ ≤ 5.0 ng/mL)	1.842	0.975–3.483	0.060
Underlying disease
Hypertension	0.757	0.409–1.401	0.376
Diabetes mellitus	0.464	0.184–1.168	0.103
Heart disease	0.531	0.129–2.185	0.381
Cerebrovascular disease	2.407	0.749–7.731	0.140
Pulmonary disease	0.931	0.290–2.988	0.904
Preoperative stenting	3.012	0.731–12.416	0.127
Obstruction	1.013	0.456–2.250	0.974
Perforation	4.608	2.159–9.837	< 0.001	4.436	2.024–9.722	< 0.001
Operative method (open/MIS)	1.563	0.873–2.797	0.133
Emergency surgery	3.218	1.372–7.549	0.007	0.927	0.350–2.456	0.879
Operative time (> 160/ ≤ 160 min)	1.693	0.965–2.971	0.067
Transfusion during operation	2.970	1.178–7.486	0.021	1.635	0.501–5.338	0.416
Pathologic T category (3, 4/0, 1, 2)	3.288	1.600–6.7155	0.001	1.133	0.446–2.880	0.793
Pathologic N category (+/−)	3.361	1.860–6.074	< 0.001	1.787	0.824–3.876	0.142
Lymphovascular invasion (+/−)	3.365	1.907–5.939	< 0.001	1.072	0.518–2.217	0.852
Perineural invasion (+/−)	5.665	3.183–10.082	< 0.001	3.249	1.779–5.934	< 0.001
Tumor budding (+/−)	4.076	2.276–7.300	< 0.001	4.606	2.422–8.758	< 0.001
Tumor size (> 3.6/ ≤ 3.6)	1.156	0.667–2.004	0.605
Neoadjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.286	1.227–4.092	0.005	4.177	2.231–7.819	< 0.001
Adjuvant therapy (+/−)	2.348	1.205–4.576	0.012	0.782	0.333–1.834	0.572
CD (III, IV/I, II)	1.273	0.731–2.215	0.394

Table 1. Type and frequency of complication

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2. Clinicopathologic features of surgery-related complications cohort (n=310)

Values are presented as median (range) or number (%).

ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CD, Clavien-Dindo classification.

Not available (N/A) 18 cases.

N/A 12 cases.

Table 3. Risk factors influencing Clavien-Dindo grades III and IV in surgery-related complication cohort

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status; BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; MIS, minimally invasive surgery.

Table 4. Prognostic factors influencing disease-free survival in surgery-related complication cohort