-
Original Article
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(3):161-165.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.3.161
- Laparoscopic vs. Conventional Appendectomy in Pregnancy.
-
Kim, Do Hyoung , Lee, In Kyu , Choi, Seung Bong , Lee, Yoon Suk , Lee, Sang Kuon , Oh, Seong Taek , Jeon, Hae Myung , Kim, Jun Gi , Kim, Eung Kook , Chang, Suk Kyun
-
1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. cmcgslee@catholic.ac.kr
- Abstract
- PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical course and pregnancy outcome according to operative management of appendictis in the Department of Surgery.
METHODS
We reviewed the charts of pregnant patients who went through a convential appendectomy and a laparoscopic appendectomy at the Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Korea St. Mary's Hospital, from May 1995 to June 2006. RESULTS: The incidence of acute appendicitis during pregnancy was the highest at the 2nd trimester and at ages from 25 to 30 years. The laparoscopic appendectomy was shorter than the open appendectomy in hospital stay and decreased leukocytosis faster in the first postoperative day, except in cases of perforated appendicitis, but the operation times were similar. There was a significant difference in gestational age at delivery between perforated appendicitis and suppurative. We found one fetal anomaly, but it was not related to either the appendicitis or the operation method. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that a laparoscopic appendectomy was better than an open appendectomy for recovery and was safe in pregnant appendicitis patients at any gestational age. However, follow up and investigation in a larger population is needed to get more accurate results.
Keywords :Pregnancy;Appendicitis;Laparoscopy
