-
Original Article
-
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16(4):223-230.
- Clinical and Physiologic Characteristics of Rectal Prolapse in Males.
-
Yoon, Seo Gue , Lee, Kwang Real , Cho, Kyung A , Hwang, Do Yean , Kim, Khun Uk , Kang, Young Won , Park, Weon Kap , Kim, Hyun Sik , Lee, Jung Kyun , Kim, Kwang Yun
-
1Department of Surgery, Song-Do Colorectal Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Abstract
- This study compares the sexual differences among rectal prolapse patients regarding the clinical and the physiologic characteristics with emphasis on males.
METHODS
The clinical data, functional status and operative records of 43 patients, who had completed both clinical and functional evaluations were collected in a prospective database and were analyzed according to sex. The functional status of the patients was evaluated by Wexner's constipation score (0~30), Wexner's incontinence score (0~20), anorectal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML).
RESULTS
The incidences of rectal prolapse in males (n=22) and in females (n=21) were similar. The age of onset for males was lower (mean standard deviation, 19.6 19.59 (50% in childhood) vs 52.0 20.75 years; p=0.001) and the duration of symptoms was longer (31.5+/-19.87 vs 12.5+/-14.31 years; p<0.001). Surgery in males was most commonly performed during the sexually active years (51.2+/-16.34 vs 64.5+/-13.19; p=0.006). The incidence of mucosal prolapse in males was higher (10/22 vs 4/17; p=0.065). The incidences and the severities of defecation difficulty in males and females were similar (n=12, mean Wexner score=8.4 vs n=12, mean Wexner score=9.9; p=NS) but, the incidences and the severities of fecal incontinence were lower in males (n=4, mean Wexner score=4.3 vs n=17, mean Wexner score= 14.2; p<0.001). The maximum resting pressure was higher in males (39.2+/-21.46 vs 26.3+/-19.98 mmHg; p=0.049), and the maximum squeezing pressure was better preserved (131.2+/-62.63 vs 67.5+/-37.99 mmHg; p<0.001). No significant difference existed in the PNTML. Female patients underwent abdominal resection rectopexy (n=6), perineal rectosigmoidectomy with lavatoroplasty (n=11), and Delorme's procedure (n=4), but all male patients preferred the perineal approach (rectosigmoidectomy with lavatoroplasty (n=8), Delorme's procedure (n=14)) for fear of sexual dysfunction after the abdominal approach.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that the mechanism for developing rectal prolapse in male and female may be different and that surgical treatment should be tailored to the patient.
Keywords :Rectal prolapse;Male;Fecal incontinence;Constipation;Surgery
