Current Situation on the Diagnosis of Anismus-Discordances Between Imaging and a Physiologic Study

Kyung Ha Lee; Ji Yeon Kim

doi:10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.159

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Ann Coloproctol > Volume 32(5); 2016 > Article

Editorial Current Situation on the Diagnosis of Anismus-Discordances Between Imaging and a Physiologic Study: Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim; Annals of Coloproctology 2016;32(5):159-159.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.159
Published online: October 31, 2016

Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Correspondence to: Ji Yeon Kim, M.D. Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, 282, Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea. Tel: +82-42-280-7175, Fax: +82-42-257-8024, jkim@cnu.ac.kr

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

3,919 Views
45 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Crossref
1 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

ARTICLE INFORMATION
REFERENCES

See Article on Page [Related article:] 170-174

Anismus has been recognized as a cause of chronic constipation. Failure of relaxation of the puborectalis muscle and the external anal sphincter muscle or a paradoxical contraction of both during straining to defecate is thought to be the cause of anismus or spastic pelvic floor syndrome and is associated with a difficult or impossible defecation. This pathology was documented by tests of anorectal physiology. The basic mechanism behind persistent constipation is the failure of the anorectal angle to straighten and of the anal canal to shorten as a result of sustained contraction of the puborectalis muscle [1].

Anismus is one of the many diseases that are easily underestimated, considering the patient's agony. Many colorectal specialists may have experiences with providing only reassurance to patients with anismus because they believe no definite, optimal treatment exists or suppose that the therapeutic result may not satisfy the patients. However, if colorectal specialists and clinicians understand more about anismus and try to evaluate it correctly, many more patients than we expect may receive more relief than we expect, even though that relief may only be mental relief.

According to the Rome classification [2], diagnosis of anismus is based on imaging "or" a physiologic study with the patient's symptoms. In this study [3], authors evaluate the discordances between imaging and physiologic studies, and the results should be practical and useful in clinical circumstances. Because diagnosis is not confirmed based on just one finding of those examinations, clinicians must understand how discordance can exist between the two. Consequently, because of that discordance, other morphological or functional conditions that mimic anismus or coexist with it must be found. However, the result of a physiologic study cannot be used to judge the result of an imaging study. If further study would be able to suggest a way to reduce the discordance between the two types of studies by combining the results of a balloon expulsion test, electromyography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency electromyography, which are also generally recommended to evaluate anismus [4], as developed from a description of the subjective discordance between the 2 studies, such a study would be of great interest.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Anismus: the cause of constipation? Results of investigation and treatment. World J Surg 1992;16:831–835. Article PubMed
2. Bharucha AE, Wald A, Enck P, Rao S. Functional anorectal disorders. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1510–1518. Article PubMed
3. Pisano U, Irvine L, Szczachor J, Jawad A, MacLeod A, Lim M. Anismus, physiology, radiology: is it time for some pragmatism? a comparative study of radiological and anorectal physiology findings in patients with anismus. Ann Coloproctol 2016;32:170–174.Article PubMed PMC
4. Paquette IM, Varma M, Ternent C, Melton-Meaux G, Rafferty JF, Feingold D, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guideline for the evaluation and management of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:479–492. Article PubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of the puborectalis muscle and anal sphincter in patients with anismus
Ayşenur Buz Yaşar, Abdullah Emre Sarıoğlu, Soner Türkoğlu
Northwestern Medical Journal.2025; 5(3): 135. CrossRef
Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the outcome of puborectalis division in the treatment of anismus
Sameh Hany Emile, Samer Hani Barsom, Sualeh Muslim Khan, Steven D. Wexner
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(4): 369. CrossRef

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Current Situation on the Diagnosis of Anismus-Discordances Between Imaging and a Physiologic Study

Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):159-159. Published online October 31, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.159

XML Download

Current Situation on the Diagnosis of Anismus-Discordances Between Imaging and a Physiologic Study