Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and MTHFR Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer

Bong Su Kang; Dae Ho Ahn; Nam Keun Kim; Jong Woo Kim

doi:10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.78

Articles

Page Path: HOME > J Korean Soc Coloproctol > Volume 27(2); 2011 > Article

Original Article Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and MTHFR Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer: Bong Su Kang, Dae Ho Ahn, Nam Keun Kim¹, Jong Woo Kim; Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2011;27(2):78-82.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.78
Published online: April 30, 2011

Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

¹Institute for Clinical Research, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Jong Woo Kim, M.D. Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, 351 Yatap-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 463-712, Korea. Tel: +82-31-780-5250, Fax: +82-31-780-5259, kjw@cha.ac.kr

• Received: February 16, 2011 • Accepted: April 18, 2011

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

4,589 Views
33 Download
17 Crossref
17 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ARTICLE INFORMATION
Acknowledgments
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
There have been studies on the relations between metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer or on the relations between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism and colorectal cancer, but reports on the relationship between metabolic syndrome, MTHFR polymorphism and colorectal cancer all together are rare. The aim of this study is to find the interrelation between metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism in colorectal cancer.
Methods
This study investigated 255 colorectal cancer patients (cancer group) who underwent surgery in our hospital from March 2003 to December 2008 and compared those patients to 488 healthy patients (control group). The diagnostic criterion for metabolic syndrome was based on the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III), and the MTHFR 677 polymorphism was analyzed.
Results
When colorectal cancer patients and patients in the control group were classified as MTHFR 677 subtypes, there was no difference between the two groups: CC 87 (34.1%), CT 134 (52.6%), and TT 34 (13.3%) for the cancer group and CC 145 (32.4%), CT 238 (53.1%), and TT 65 (14.5%) for the control group. Distributions of MTHFR 677C/T genotype and allele frequencies in the individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in the cancer group showed no differences. Moreover, we could find no differences in distributions of MTHFR 677C/T genotypes in the clinical and the biomedical variables of individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in the cancer group.
Conclusion
Our results show no relation between metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism in colorectal cancer. However, a further prospective study, based on a precise diagnostic criterion for metabolic syndrome, is needed.
Keywords: Metabolic syndrome; MTHFR; Colorectal neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the incidence of colorectal cancer in Korea has been increasing sharply, and it now ranks second among digestive organ malignancies. This is thought to be related to the rapid change in the life style of Koreans during past few decades due to industrialization, increased amounts of high-calorie foods and fat, etc. [1]. Colorectal cancer seems to have complicated and diverse contributing factors, including genetic tendency; environmental factors, such as dietary food, chemicals and pollution; and personal factors, such as reduced activity, obesity, hyperlipidemia, hyperinsulinemia, etc., which usually come together. In industrialized countries with aging societies, such risk factors have already been already identified. In certain patients, metabolic disorder might have a large influence in the development of colorectal cancer. In 1988, Reaven et al. [2] denominated those patients as insulin-resistant syndrome or Syndrome-X.

In 1998, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined the concept of disorders as metabolic syndrome and suggested guidelines for diagnosis. Soon after, several groups, such as the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) and the International Diabetes Foundation (IDF), have suggested modified guidelines for making an accurate diagnosis [3, 4]. In the past, metabolic syndrome was thought to be a risk factor related only with cardiovascular disease; however, it has also been considered to be directly and indirectly related to other diseases such as cancer [2, 3]. Sturmer et al. [5] studied 494 colorectal cancer patients in a population of 22,071 and reported obesity and diabetes as risk factors causing colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, they could not find any relationship with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Ju et al. [6], reported a domestic study with 558 adult patients, in which metabolic syndrome might have increased the incidence of colorectal polyps, particularly in males.

There are two major pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis, the chromosomal instability pathway and the microsatellite instability pathway, which are based on epigenetic alterations, such as hypermethylation or hypomethylation, of genes. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is one of the key enzymes in the process of folic acid metabolism, which is an important substrate for DNA synthesis. It has a major role in DNA methylation and has a close association with the synthesis of methionine. According to the polymorphism of the enzyme, the strength of the enzyme changes the reduction of methionine synthesis and DNA methylation. Based on several reports, this alteration seems to be associated with the carcinogenesis of the colorectum [7, 8].

Abnormal folic acid metabolism and hyperhomocysteinemia are known to increase the risk of coronary heart disease. Oron-Herman et al. [9] reported that hyperhomocysteinemia was an imminent factor in metabolic syndrome in a mouse model study with polymorphism of MTHFR. Ellingrod et al. [10] said that patients with the T allele in MTHFR polymorphism had a 3.7-fold increased risk of having metabolic syndrome. On the contrary, the CC wild genotype exhibited a positive relationship for the schizophrenic patients having psychiatric drugs.

So far, reports studying the relationship between metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism in colorectal cancer patients are rare, and for that reason, this study was aimed at investigating the mutual relation between MTHFR polymorphism and metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer patients as another associated risk factor.

METHODS

Subjects

We conducted a retrospective study on 255 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgery from March 2003 to December 2008. For the control group, 448 healthy adults without any disease, such as cancer or metabolic disease, who showed similar ages and gender distributions, were selected. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of our Medical Center approved this genetic study in June 2009.

Diagnosis of metabolic syndrome

In this study, we adopted the definition of metabolic syndrome from NCEP-ATP III. Patients having more than two of the following factors were defined as having metabolic syndrome; obesity, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m²; triglyceride, TG ≥ 150 mg/dL; high density cholesterol, male < 40 mg/dL and female < 50 mg/dL; fasting blood sugar, FBS ≥ 110 mg/dL; and blood pressure, systolic P ≥ 130 mm Hg or diastolic P ≥ 85 mm Hg. We used the BMI, instead of abdominal circumference, as one of the diagnostic criteria.

Analysis of MTHFR polymorphism

Specimens were taken from leukocyte or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens by using phenol/chloroform extraction methods, and the quality was adequate. The MTHFR genotype was examined using the PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method. The DNA fragment containing MTHFR 677 C > T (Ala to Val) was amplified with a GeneAmp PCR machine (Perkin Elmer 2400, Foster City, CA, USA). DNA was replicated with human genomic DNA 200 ng, 1.5-mM MgCl₂, 0.2-M deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1 unit Taq Polymerase (TaKaRa, Madison, WI, USA), and primer 100 pmol. The DNA sequence of the forward primer was 5'-GCACTTGAAGAGAAGGTGTC-3', and that of the reverse primer was 5'-AGGACGGTGCGGTGAGAGTG-3'. The PCR was set at 35 cycles in 94℃ for 30 seconds, 51℃ for 30 seconds and 72℃ for 30 seconds after a period of denaturation for 5 minutes at 94℃. The terminal portion of the DNA was elongated at 72℃ for 5 minutes. The products of PCR were precipitated in ethanol, disintegrated by Taq I restriction enzyme, and finally treated by using electrophoresis. The variant allele in the 677 C→T polymorphism causes cytosine to be replaced with thymine in the final peptides. The TT variant type shows two bands, 173 bp and 30 bp, the CT heterozygote type shows three bands, 203 bp, 173 bp and 30 bp, and the CC wild type shows a single band, 203 bp, on electrophoresis. As a qualifying control, DNA from the lymphoblastoid cells with the three types of polymorphisms was used.

Data analysis

All calculations were done with Graphpad prism 4.0 (Graphpad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and categorical data were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test and the t-test. The MedCalc ver. 10.4.0.0 (MedCalc Software Inc., Mariakerke, Belgium) was used for the ANOVA test and the chi-square test. Statistical significance was accepted at P ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 255 cancer patients, the metabolic syndrome group included 110 patients (43%) and the non-metabolic syndrome group included 145 patients (57%). A comparison of these two groups based on the diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome, including BMI, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, fasting blood sugar, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure, showed statistically significant differences (Table 1).

MTHFR 677 polymorphism in cancer patients was distributed as follows: 87 cases (34.1%) of CC type, 134 cases (52.6%) of CT type, and 34 cases (13.3%) of TT type. The control group showed a distribution similar to that of the cancer group with 145 cases (32.4%) of CC type, 238 cases (53.1%) of CT type and 65 cases (14.5%) of TT type (Table 2). The distributions of MTHFR 677C/T genotype and allele frequencies in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in the colorectal cancer patients group showed no definite differences (Table 3).

Clinical and biomedical variables of metabolic syndrome were individually analyzed according to 3 MTHFR 677C/T genotype in the cancer patient group, but the results showed no statistically significant differences (Table 4). Clinical and biomedical variables in individuals were reanalyzed according to the three genotypes in the two patients group with and without metabolic syndrome. However, the results did not indicate any statistically significant differences (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

Metabolic syndrome is referred to as the grouping phenomenon of several metabolic risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, etc., that mainly cause cardiovascular disease. Although diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome have been changing with different expert groups since the first guidelines of the WHO in 1998, insulin resistance and obesity have always been considered as important basic factors [3]. Metabolic syndrome, the well-known major risk factor of coronary heart disease, has now been studied for its relationship to other diseases, including cancer [3, 4].

In colorectal cancer studies, not only individual metabolic factor but also other related factors, such as low physical activity, abdominal obesity, etc., were evaluated for their possible relation to cancer. For example, Frezza et al. [11] insisted that being overweight was closely related to colon cancer and that the reduction of weight was important for decreasing the risk of cancer. Chang and Ulrich [12] reported that a high level of blood sugar affected the carcinogenesis of the colon. Sturmer et al. [5], in their 19-year following-up study for one healthy group, reported that being overweight and having diabetes were more closely related to colon cancer than other metabolic factors. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the adult population older than 50 years was reported to be approximately 45% in the United States and 16.3% in South Korea [6, 13]. On the other hand, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in colon cancer patients was high in our study, approaching 43%.

Playing an important role for not only DNA synthesis but also DNA methylation, MTHFR takes part in the metabolism of folic acid, resulting in the formation of S-adenosyl methionine, which is mainly involved in the methylation. There are two major polymorphisms of MTHFR, 677C (alanine)→T (valine) and 1298 A (glutamate)→C (alanine) substitutions. The alterations from these polymorphisms result in decreased efficacy of the enzyme, which might subsequently decrease DNA methylation and may be related to colorectal carcinogenesis.

The TT subtype decreases the enzyme strength by about 30% and causes hypomethylation. The TT subtype affects the blood level of folic acid, and it has been reported to increase the risk of colon cancer, especially in heavy alcohol drinkers with a low level of folic acid. The TT subtype was contrarily reported not only to decrease the risk of colon cancer but also to increase the proportion of colon cancer patients with microsatellite instability [14-16]. In this study, we couldn't find any difference of frequency for the MTHFR polymorphism between the colorectal cancer group and the healthy control group, with the colorectal cancer group showing 13.3% TT subtype and the healthy control group showing 14.5% TT subtype. This result is similar to our previous report, showing 11.5% TT subtype in the colon cancer group and 14.4% in the control group [7].

Sporadic microsatellite instability is thought to be caused by promoter hypermethylation of the MLH1 mismatch repair gene. In the case of a low level of folic acid concentration, the TT subtype causes a large extent of hypomethylation and a consequent alteration of gene expression.

We have mentioned the TT subtype as a prognostic factor for colon cancer [7]; on the other hand, we were able to find several interesting articles about studies on the TT subtype for other fields. For example, Ellingrod et al. [10] reported that patients in the schizophrenic psychiatric patient group with the TT subtype had a 3.7-fold increased risk of metabolic syndrome and suggested that this type seems to increase insulin resistance and abdominal obesity.

As mentioned earlier, on database such as PubMed, we couldn't find any reports similar to ours on the relationships of colon cancer, metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism all together, although there were several reports that individually studied only the relation between colon cancer and metabolic syndrome, and only the relation between colon cancer and MTHFR polymorphism. In this study, the distributions of MTHFR polymorphism based on the presence or absence of metabolic syndrome did not show different patterns, and even the frequencies of the T allele showed similar patterns. As a result, we could find no relation between metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism in colon cancer patients.

The reason we did not have any significant result, despite our large sample size compared to that of Ellingrod et al. [10], who obtained statistically significant results, is thought to be due to the particular patient group, i.e., psychiatric patients, Ellingrod et al.'s. We assume that medications or other clinical factors might have contributes to their being more vulnerable to metabolic syndrome.

In order to get rid of confounding bias after surgery, we conducted this study only with patients who had been diagnosed prior to surgery as having metabolic syndrome. However, the individual factors of metabolic syndrome (hypertension, blood sugar level, cholesterol level, etc.) could have varied according to the clinical condition or the situation of the patients, and even the accuracy of medical records might be doubted in this retrospective study.

As a factor of metabolic syndrome, we adopted the BMI, instead of the abdominal circumference, because the abdominal circumference is often omitted on medical records. Especially, Korean people tend to have abdominal obesity even in the normal range of height and weight, and whether the BMI or the abdominal circumference is chosen for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome seems to affect the results of the study. Besides, there are different criteria for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome and agreement on criteria for a definite diagnosis has not yet been reached.

We think that a large and prospective study might be needed in order to achieve accurate and meaningful results. If there were to be a significant difference between MTHFR polymorphism in metabolic syndrome and that in colon cancer, then the comparison of survival based on polymorphism would be meaningful. Even though we have a few other reports for comparison, we have failed to achieve significant results in this study. Still, we believe that this study itself to be meaningful as a first report studying the relationship between MTHFR polymorphism and metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer.

In conclusion, the results of this study revealed no relation between metabolic syndrome and MTHFR polymorphism in colorectal cancer. Although we could not elicit such a relationship, a further prospective study based on precise diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome may be able to establish such a relationship.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korean Grant funded by the Korean Government (2009-0075784).

REFERENCES

1. Annual report of the national cancer registry in Korea 2006 [Internet]. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2009.cited 2011 Mar 20. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare; Available from: http://library.mw.go.kr/skyblueopen/users/bogun/PdfViewer.aspx?mastid=63250&pdf_url=K0031255.pdf
2. Reaven GM, Chen YD. Role of insulin in regulation of lipoprotein metabolism in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Rev 1988;4:639–652. Article PubMed
3. Inoue S, Zimmet P. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. 2000.Sydney: Health Communications Australia Pty Ltd.
4. Lym YL, Hwang SW, Shim HJ, Oh EH, Chang YS, Cho BL. Prevalence and risk factors of the metabolic syndrome as defined by NCEP-ATP III. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2003;24:135–143.
5. Sturmer T, Buring JE, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, Glynn RJ. Metabolic abnormalities and risk for colorectal cancer in the physician's health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2391–2397. Article PubMed PMC
6. Ju JH, Lim TK, Shin KK, Park KH, Park KC, Kim MJ, et al. Relationship between the metabolic syndrome and colorectal polyps. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2007;28:134–140.
7. Kim HS, Kang BS, Kim JW, Ahn DH, Bae SJ, Kim NG. Polymorphism of the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene and microsatellite instability (MSI) in mucinous colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2008;24:329–336.Article
8. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998;396:643–649. Article PubMed PDF
9. Oron-Herman M, Rosenthal T, Sela BA. Hyperhomocysteinemia as a component of syndrome X. Metabolism 2003;52:1491–1495. Article PubMed
10. Ellingrod VL, Miller DD, Taylor SF, Moline J, Holman T, Kerr J. Metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in schizophrenia patients receiving antipsychotics genotyped for the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T and 1298A/C variants. Schizophr Res 2008;98:47–54. Article PubMed
11. Frezza EE, Wachtel MS, Chiriva-Internati M. Influence of obesity on the risk of developing colon cancer. Gut 2006;55:285–291. Article PubMed PMC
12. Chang CK, Ulrich CM. Hyperinsulinaemia and hyperglycaemia: possible risk factors of colorectal cancer among diabetic patients. Diabetologia 2003;46:595–607. Article PubMed PDF
13. Reilly MP, Rader DJ. The metabolic syndrome: more than the sum of its parts? Circulation 2003;108:1546–1551. Article PubMed
14. Chang SC, Lin PC, Lin JK, Yang SH, Wang HS, Li AF. Role of MTHFR polymorphisms and folate levels in different phenotypes of sporadic colorectal cancers. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007;22:483–489. Article PubMed
15. Shannon B, Gnanasampanthan S, Beilby J, Iacopetta B. A polymorphism in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene predisposes to colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Gut 2002;50:520–524. Article PubMed PMC
16. Eaton AM, Sandler R, Carethers JM, Millikan RC, Galanko J, Keku TO. 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 and 1298 polymorphisms, folate intake, and microsatellite instability in colon cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2023–2029. Article PubMed PMC

Table 1

Clinical and biochemical variables for individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure. P < 0.05.

Table 2

Comparison of MTHFR subtypes between the control and the colorectal cancer groups

Values are presented as number (%).

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C > T subtypes: CC, CT and TT.

Table 3

Distribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T genotype and allele frequencies in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer

Values are presented as number (%).

MS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 4

Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, of metabolic syndrome in individuals with colorectal cancer (n = 255)

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 5

Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Meta Analysis of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and its association with folate and colorectal cancer
Meng Ye, Guojie Xu, Liming Zhang, Zhihui Kong, Zhenhua Qiu
BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic significance of three endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) polymorphisms and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with colorectal cancer
Eun Ju Ko, Eo Jin Kim, Hye Jung Cho, Jisu Oh, Han Sung Park, Chang Soo Ryu, Jung Oh Kim, Hak Hoon Jun, So Young Chong, Jong Woo Kim, Nam Keun Kim
Genes & Genomics.2022; 44(6): 659. CrossRef
Associations of MTRR and TSER polymorphisms related to folate metabolism with susceptibility to metabolic syndrome
Young Ree Kim, Seung-Ho Hong
Genes & Genomics.2019; 41(8): 983. CrossRef
Association of MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism with metabolic syndrome in a Chinese population: a case–control study
Jin Wang, Lijuan Xu, Hongmiao Xia, Ying Li, Shiqi Tang
Journal of International Medical Research.2018; 46(7): 2658. CrossRef
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis
Lingyan Xu, Zhiqiang Qin, Feng Wang, Shuhui Si, Lele Li, Peinan Lin, Xiao Han, Xiaomin Cai, Haiwei Yang, Yanhong Gu
Bioscience Reports.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Associations of MTHFR C677T polymorphism with insulin resistance, results of NURSE Study (Nursing Unacquainted Related Stress Etiologies)
Motahareh Kheradmand, Zhila Maghbooli, Sedigheh Salemi, Mahnaz Sanjari
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism and risk of ischemic stroke in North Indian population: A hospital based case–control study
Amit Kumar, Shubham Misra, Anjali Hazarika, Pradeep Kumar, Ram Sagar, Abhishek Pathak, Kamalesh Chakravarty, Kameshwar Prasad
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics.2016; 17(4): 359. CrossRef
Risk of prostate cancer and thrombosis-related factor polymorphisms
SOMAYEHSADAT GHASEMI, AYDIN TAVAKOLI, MOHAMAD MOGHADAM, MOHAMAD ALI ZARGAR, MARYAM ABBASPOUR, NASIM HATAMNEJADIAN, AHMAD EBRAHIMI
Biomedical Reports.2014; 2(1): 53. CrossRef
The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and tumor risk: evidence from 134 case–control studies
Min Tang, Shang-Qian Wang, Bian-Jiang Liu, Qiang Cao, Bing-Jie Li, Peng-Chao Li, Yong-Fei Li, Chao Qin, Wei Zhang
Molecular Biology Reports.2014; 41(7): 4659. CrossRef
Associations of MTHFR C677T and MTRR A66G Gene Polymorphisms with Metabolic Syndrome: A Case-Control Study in Northern China
Boyi Yang, Shujun Fan, Xueyuan Zhi, Da Wang, Yongfang Li, Yinuo Wang, Yanxun Wang, Jian Wei, Quanmei Zheng, Guifan Sun
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2014; 15(12): 21687. CrossRef
Association of MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in Asians: evidence of 12,255 subjects
X.-P. Guo, Y. Wang, H. Zhao, S.-D. Song, J. Zhou, Y. Han
Clinical and Translational Oncology.2014; 16(7): 623. CrossRef
Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms with colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis
MENGMENG ZHAO, XUELIAN LI, CHENGZHONG XING, BAOSEN ZHOU
Biomedical Reports.2013; 1(5): 781. CrossRef
The 677C>T (rs1801133) Polymorphism in the MTHFR Gene Contributes to Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Based on 71 Research Studies
Zan Teng, Lei Wang, Shuang Cai, Ping Yu, Jin Wang, Jing Gong, Yunpeng Liu, Rossella Rota
PLoS ONE.2013; 8(2): e55332. CrossRef
MTHFR C677T polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer susceptibility: evidence from 61 case–control studies
Xuewen Sheng, Yanxi Zhang, Erjiang Zhao, Su Lu, Xiaoli Zheng, Hong Ge, Weiquan Lu
Molecular Biology Reports.2012; 39(10): 9669. CrossRef
MTHFR C677T Polymorphism and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Asians, a Meta-analysis of 21 Studies
Zhen Yang, Xie-Fu Zhang, Hong-Xiang Liu, Yong-Shun Hao, Chun-Lin Zhao
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012; 13(4): 1203. CrossRef
Quantitative assessment of the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in East Asians
Shan Zhong, Jia-He Yang, Kai Liu, B. H. Jiao, Zhi-Jie Chang
Tumor Biology.2012; 33(6): 2041. CrossRef
Metabonomic Variations Associated with AOM-Induced Precancerous Colorectal Lesions and Resveratrol Treatment
Wen Liao, Hai Wei, Xiaoyan Wang, Yunping Qiu, Xiaojun Gou, Xiaolei Zhang, Mingmei Zhou, Jianbing Wu, Tao Wu, Fang Kou, Yongyu Zhang, Zhaoxiang Bian, Guoxiang Xie, Wei Jia
Journal of Proteome Research.2012; 11(6): 3436. CrossRef

PubReader

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and MTHFR Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer

J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(2):78-82. Published online April 30, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.78

XML Download

Relationship between Metabolic Syndrome and MTHFR Polymorphism in Colorectal Cancer

Table 1

Clinical and biochemical variables for individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure. P < 0.05.

Table 2

Comparison of MTHFR subtypes between the control and the colorectal cancer groups

Values are presented as number (%).

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C > T subtypes: CC, CT and TT.

Table 3

Distribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T genotype and allele frequencies in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer

Values are presented as number (%).

MS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 4

Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, of metabolic syndrome in individuals with colorectal cancer (n = 255)

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 5

Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 1 Clinical and biochemical variables for individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure. P < 0.05.

Table 2 Comparison of MTHFR subtypes between the control and the colorectal cancer groups

Values are presented as number (%).

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677 C > T subtypes: CC, CT and TT.

Table 3 Distribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C/T genotype and allele frequencies in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome in colorectal cancer

Values are presented as number (%).

MS, metabolic syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table 4 Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, of metabolic syndrome in individuals with colorectal cancer (n = 255)

HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 5 Clinical and biomedical variables, analyzed by genotype, in individuals with and without metabolic syndrome

BMI, body mass index; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; FBS, fasting blood sugar; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.