Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/colon/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-02.txt): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 95 Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 96 Comparison of Recovery of Bowel Motility after Laparoscopic-assisted and Open Surgery for Right Colon Cancer: A Study of Gastric Emptying by Using Sitz-marker(TM) and Changes of Intraperitoneal Temperature.
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Korean Soc Coloproctol > Volume 20(6); 2004 > Article
Original Article
Comparison of Recovery of Bowel Motility after Laparoscopic-assisted and Open Surgery for Right Colon Cancer: A Study of Gastric Emptying by Using Sitz-marker(TM) and Changes of Intraperitoneal Temperature.
Park, Chan Wook , Choi, Gyu Seog , Jun, Soo Han
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2004;20(6):351-357

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. kyuschoi@knu.ac.kr
prev next
  • 978 Views
  • 4 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

PURPOSE
Early recovery of gastrointestinal motility is one of the main advantages of laparoscopic intestinal surgery. However, the reasons for this advantage are still not well known. To compare recovery of bowel motility after laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for right colon cancer, we analyzed early clinical results, including both the gastric emptying time by using a Sitz-marker(TM) and the intraperitoneal temperature.
METHODS
From January 1996 to December 1999, 80 curative right hemicolectomies, which were divided into a laparoscopic-assisted surgery group (LS) with 36 patients and an open surgery group (OS) with 44 patients, were prospectively, but not randomly, studied for recovery of bowel motility. Clinical results, such as the pain score, the time to gas passage, the time to resumption of meals the hospital stay and the gastric emptying time obtained by using a Sitz-markers(TM), were evaluated. At the beginning and the end of the operation, the intraperitoneal temperature was checked at three different points.
RESULTS
In the LS and OS groups, the first flatus passed at the 3.0 and the 3.67 postoperative day (POD) and oral intake resumed at the 3.9 and the 5.2 POD, respectively (P<0.05). The numbers of Sitz-markers(TM) remaining in the stomach after surgery were 15.0 and 18.7 at the 1st POD (P<0.0001), 6.4 and 10.8 at the 2nd POD (P>0.05), 1.7 and 4.2 at the 3rd POD (P<0.05) and 0 and 1.1 at the 4th POD (P<0.05), respectively. No difference in intraperitoneal temperature was noted.
CONCLUSIONS
We found earlier recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery, but could not identify any relationship between bowel function and the possible parameter of intraperitoneal temperature.

Related articles

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP