J Korean Soc Coloproctol Search

CLOSE


Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 2001;17(4):159-163.
Clinical Trial Comparing Pain and Clinical Function after Conventional Semi-open Milligan Hemorrhoidectomy vs Open Ultrasonic Dissector Hemorrhoidectomy.
Park, Chul Woon , Lee, Kil Yeon , Park, Ho Chul , Lee, Sang Mok , Lee, Kee Hyung , Yoon, Choong , Joo, Hoong Zae
Department of Surgery, Kyung-Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. keehlee@chollian.net
Abstract
PURPOSE
Hemorrhoidectomy is considered to be a painful operation, therefore some patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids conceal their symptoms to defer a much-needed surgical procedure. Patients who have undergone hemorrhoidectomy have experienced constipation or urinary retention due to postoperative pain. Several interventions have been used to relieve postoperative pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Nevertheless, the results are unsatisfactory. Hemorrhoidectomy with ultrasonic dissector have less thermal injury and can avoid ligation and suture. This study compared conventional semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy with open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy.
METHODS
One hundred patients with prolapsed symptomatic hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to semi-open Milligan (n=50) or open ultrasonic dissector (n=50) hemorrhoidectomy. Operation time, postoperative complication, hospital stay, degree and duration of postoperative pain, pain on bowel movement, and urinary retention were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in excised pile number. Operation time of open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy was shorter than that of semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy (P<0.05). The open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy group resulted in less postoperative pain (P<0.05) and shorter duration of pain (P<0.05) and postoperative hospital stay (P<0.05) than semi-open Milligan hemorrhoidectomy. Urinary retention did not occur in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the higher cost, open ultrasonic dissector hemorrhoidectomy results in less postoperative pain, shorter operation time and hospital stay than the conventional hemorrhoidectomy.
Key Words: Ultrasonic dissector; Hemorrhoidectomy
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 929 View
  • 15 Download
Related articles in ACP

Benefits of Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy Compared with Ultrasonic Dissector and Milligan's Hemorrhoidectomy.2002 June;18(3)



ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Room 1519, Suseo Hyundai Venture-vill, 10 Bamgogae-ro 1-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06349, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2040-7737    Fax: +82-2-2040-7735    E-mail: editor@coloproctol.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Coloproctology.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer