| Fecal Soiling Manometric findings and treatment. |
|
Lee, Kwang Real , Whang, Do Yun , Kim, Kun Wook , Park, Weon Kap , Yoo, Jung Jun , Lim, Seok Won , Kim, Hyun Shig , Lee, Jong Kyun |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abstract |
BACKGROUND
Fecal continence is maintained by complex coordination of the sphincter mechanism and the anorectal sensation. Although most patients with fecal incontinence have a dysfunction of anal sphincter, fecal soiling seems to be related with a change in the anorectal sensation.
PURPOSE
This study was done to evaluate the manometric findings and the methods of treatment for patients with fecal soiling.
METHODS
The manometric findings from 25 patients with fecal soiling were compared with those from 22 normal controls.
The patients were treated with biofeedback and with bulking agent.
RESULTS
All the patients affected by fecal soiling were male except for one. There were no differences in the mean maximal resting pressure (MRP), and the mean maximal squeezing pressure (MSP) between the patients and the controls. The mean sphincter length and the mean length of the high pressure zone (HPZ) of the patients were significantly longer (50.5 vs. 55.6 mm and 28.2 vs. 31.3 mm, respectively; p<0.05 student t-test) than those of the controls. The minimal sensory volume (MSV) was significantly larger in the patient group, with a mean of 24.2 ml vs. 17.8 ml, than in the control group (p<0.05). The mean volume necessary to induce the recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RR) was 47.1 ml for the control group and 32.6 ml for the patient group (p<0.05). In the longitudinal profile of the anal sphincter, the HPZ was shifted proximally and the pressure peak was broader in the fecal soiling group. Of the 14 patients treated with biofeedback, 11 responded well.
CONCLUSION
Almost all of the patients affected by fecal soiling were men. The MRP and the MSP of the patients with fecal soiling were not lower than those of the normal controls. The sphincter length was longer in the patients with soiling than in the controls(p<0.05). However, for the fecal soiling group the distribution of the pressure along the anal canal was different in the sense that the HPZ was shifted proximally and the pressure peak was broader. The changes in the MSV and the RR suggest that there may be a defect in the anorectal sensation. The patients responded well to the combined use of biofeedback and a bulking agent. |
| Key Words:
Fecal soiling; Manometry; Biofeedback |
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI
